Mjallby AIF vs. Vasteraas SK

Platform comparison

Market context

Mjallby AIF hosts Västerås SK at Strandvallen this Friday for a crucial Allsvenskan fixture, yet the Polymarket contract for a Mjallby win sits at a stark 0% implied probability. This on-chain price, settled in USDC on Polygon via conditional tokens, defies the statistical consensus which heavily favours the home side. Data models project a Mjallby victory with roughly 49% to 53% likelihood, while Sky Sports confirms the 6:00pm kickoff time, suggesting the market is either pricing a specific non-score outcome or reacting to unlisted roster news rather than the underlying match dynamics.

Historically, such a divergence between statistical probability and market price often signals a binary event dependency, such as a confirmed team walkover or a suspended player list that invalidates the standard win condition. Comparable cases in Swedish football prediction markets show that when crowd-implied probabilities hit zero despite positive model edges, traders are usually hedging against a fixture cancellation or a specific settlement rule that excludes a standard home win. The current 0% reading implies the market expects the contract to resolve as NO regardless of the match result on the pitch.

Traders must monitor official Allsvenskan announcements for any fixture postponements or squad suspensions that could trigger a null settlement. Recent analysis from Moltips highlights Västerås’s poor away defence and Mjallby’s stable home attacking form, noting the match could be open with a 49% goal probability, but these factors do not explain the zero pricing. The primary catalyst remains the league’s official schedule confirmation for the 16th round; any delay or cancellation before the 17:00Z settlement window will lock the YES outcome at zero, rendering the statistical edge irrelevant for on-chain holders.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4

Methodology

This page reviews Mjallby AIF vs. Vasteraas SK across five venues. The live probability is the Polymarket mid-price, sourced directly from the on-chain Polygon order book; the comparison columns benchmark each venue on fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is PolyGram. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like PolyGram trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.