Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open the market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open the market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open the market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open the market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open the market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez | 100% |
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez Match O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez Set 2 Winner | 100% |
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez Match O/U 22.5 | 100% |
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez Match O/U 23.5 | 100% |
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez Set 1 Winner | 0% |
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 0% |
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs Georgina Garcia Perez Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
Market context
Eva Vedder and Georgina Garcia Perez are set to face off in the Hamburg European Open qualification round, a match originally scheduled for 19 July 2026, though today’s Polymarket contract already prices Vedder as the near-certain winner at 100% YES. On Polygon, this USDC-backed position uses conditional tokens to lock in the outcome: if Vedder advances, the token resolves to “Eva Vedder”; if Garcia Perez wins, it resolves to her name; and if the match is cancelled or delayed beyond seven days without a result, the market splits 50–50.
Historically, qualification matches in European summer tournaments like Hamburg often see one-sided outcomes when a higher-ranked or more experienced player faces a qualifier with limited top-level exposure. In recent years, similar 100% implied-probability contracts in tennis qualifiers have resolved cleanly unless an injury or walkover occurs before the first ball, as seen in the Robinhood prediction market rules for this event, which specify fair-price resolution for pre-match cancellations due to injury or forfeiture [1].
Traders should monitor the official tournament schedule for any updates on player availability, particularly around the 8:30 AM ET start time, and watch for late injury announcements from either side. The Hamburg European Open’s official site and the ITF’s tournament page are the primary sources for real-time changes, and any delay beyond the seven-day window would trigger the 50–50 settlement clause, nullifying the current pricing advantage.
Sources: 1
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like PolyGram trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Hamburg European Open, Qualification: Eva Vedder vs … on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →