Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open the market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open the market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open the market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open the market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open the market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Set 1 Winner | 100% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Match O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Match O/U 22.5 | 100% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Match O/U 23.5 | 100% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa | 0% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Set 2 Winner | 0% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
Market context
Polymarket currently prices Gjorcheska's advancement at zero, reflecting either extreme confidence in Chiesa's superiority or insufficient liquidity to establish a meaningful two-way market. The match is scheduled for Rome on 13 July 2026, with settlement contingent on a completed result by 20 July. On-chain, this resolves as a binary conditional token pair on Polygon, denominated in USDC, where the 0% YES price suggests traders either view Chiesa as a prohibitive favourite or anticipate match cancellation risk outweighing Gjorcheska's winning chances.
Gjorcheska, a Macedonian player, and Chiesa, an Italian competitor, represent vastly different career trajectories and ranking positions that typically anchor such pricing. Chiesa's home advantage in Rome carries material weight in tennis markets, particularly on clay where Italian players historically perform well. However, zero probability assignments in prediction markets often signal data scarcity rather than certainty—comparable lower-ranked matchups at European summer events frequently trade with 15–30% YES probabilities for the underdog, suggesting the current price may reflect thin order books rather than consensus conviction about the match outcome.
Traders should monitor official ATP or WTA draw confirmations as the event approaches, alongside any injury announcements or withdrawal notices that could trigger the 50-50 tie-break clause. Recent scheduling disruptions at European summer tournaments have occasionally delayed matches beyond the seven-day threshold, which would also resolve this market to parity. Live odds movements typically accelerate in the 48 hours before play, when weather forecasts and final warm-up results become available.
Methodology
We track Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.
Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.
FAQ
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Rome: Lina Gjorcheska vs Deborah Chiesa on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →